|
How might states, districts, schools, and researchers use these tools?
SETDA anticipates
that different stakeholders will use this suite of tools in different
ways.
- States,
districts, or researchers with sophisticated profiling tools
already in place may want to analyze that toolset in light of SETDA's
new resources, updating where necessary. [NOTE: States should consider
"sets of questions" aligned to indicators in the SETDA framework.]
- States,
districts, or researchers currently using surveys only to determine
their school districts' technology readiness may want to a new element--site
visitation data. Although such visits are not required for valid and
reliable profiles, they do seem to increase the credibility of resultant
reports to policy makers.
- States,
districts, or researchers currently using hardware/software inventories
only may want to continue collecting such data, adding
the SETDA/Metiri surveys and/or site visitations to get more complete
baselines and trend patterns on their school districts' technology readiness
over time.
- States,
districts, or researchers
currently not collecting data state wide or school system wide
may want to adopt the SETDA/Metiri tools, using only the three surveys,
or a combination of the surveys and the site visitation protocols.
| |
Cautionary
Note:
SETDA and Metiri recommend that the suite of tools
be used as a system to maintain validity and reliability.
|
|
|